Global Governanace News

Tag: Assam illegal immigration

  • Illegal Immigrants & Internal Betrayal Threatening Assam’s Identity

    Illegal Immigrants & Internal Betrayal Threatening Assam’s Identity

    Poonam Sharma

    Assam’s Demographic Crisis:

    Assam is standing at a decisive turning point—one shaped not only by the relentless inflow of illegal immigrants from Bangladesh, but by a more painful truth: During Congress rule the government itself and a section of people within Assam itself has enabled this demographic assault. The threat is not just on the border. It is inside the system—inside offices, tribunals, and verification units where local collaborators more particularly the muslims helped transform foreign entrants into “Indian citizens.”
    This is the story of how illegal immigration, document forgery, and internal betrayal have shaken the socio-cultural and political foundations of Assam—and why the people of Assam must stop engaging in such anti-national activities before it is too late.

    Illegal Immigration in Assam: A Planned Demographic Strategy

    Assam has been burdened for decades by the influx of Bangladeshi Muslims and former East Pakistani migrants. But infiltration alone could not have changed the state’s demographic map. It required inside help—help that came from:
    Local officials those are muslims

    Border police those are muslims

    Revenue officers those are muslims

    Communally biased tribunal members

    Networks that profit from forged documents

    What began in the 1930s as a slow demographic push has become a full-scale crisis today. Assam now faces the impact:
    11 districts have become Muslim-majority. Nearly 35 Assembly seats are dominated by vote-bank politics. The Muslim population has surged to nearly 40%.This dramatic shift did not happen naturally; it was engineered.

    NRC Manipulation: When a Safeguard Becomes a Weakness

    The National Register of Citizens (NRC), designed to protect Assam, became one of the biggest examples of systemic failure. Instead of identifying illegal migrants, the NRC was hijacked by corrupt networks that inserted lakhs of infiltrators into the citizen list through:
    Fake legacy documents

    Fraudulent entries Manipulated voter records Deliberate verification lapses Politically motivated judgments

    Case Study: Saifur Rehman Talukdar

    His case exposes the collapse of the system:
    Born in East Pakistan in November 1947.

    Listed as a voter in the 1966 Assam voter list, at only 19 years old—when the voting age was 21.

    Simultaneously listed in the Bangladesh voter roll, verified by QR code. Also present in India’s 2024 voter list with the same photo and details. This is not a clerical error. It is organised infiltration supported by organised corruption.

    Taibur Rahman’s Family Legacy Data Misuse

    Another example shows how unrelated individuals used Rahman’s grandfather’s legacy data to secure NRC inclusion—again with internal assistance.

    These cases reveal a disturbing truth:

    The NRC included lakhs of illegal immigrants and failed to protect Assam. Land Encroachment and Cultural Erosion in Assam
    Illegal migrants have not stopped at obtaining documents—they have occupied land across Assam, often with local support:
    Encroachment of government land

    Invasion of forest reserves

    Occupation of Satra and temple land

    Illegal settlements in remote villages and riverine areas

    This has brutally affected Assamese culture, forest resources, and the demographic balance. What should have been protected by Assamese citizens was instead compromised by locals who facilitated or ignored illegal settlement.

    Assam Government’s Actions: A Ray of Hope

    In recent years, the Government of Assam has launched strong measures to counter this crisis:
    Crackdowns on illegal settlements

    Digitisation of land records

    Detection of forged identity documents

    Re-verification demands regarding NRC

    Police operations against suspected illegal immigrants

    These steps have brought back some confidence, but the government cannot fight this war alone.

    Assam’s People Must Stop Aiding Illegal Immigrants

    This demographic crisis is not only the failure of systems—it is the failure of people.
    The biggest danger to Assam is not the illegal immigrant,but the Assamese citizen who helps him gain citizenship.

    Those who:
    Sign fake documents

    Assist in land encroachment

    Forge legacy papers

    Give shelter or political support

    Help manipulate voter lists

    Influence tribunal decisions

    are committing anti-national acts that damage the integrity of India. Their actions are not small errors—they are acts of betrayal.
    Assam Must Wake Up Before Its Identity Is Lost If illegal immigration continues with internal support, Assam will soon lose:
    Its cultural identity

    Its political voice

    Its indigenous land

    Its demographic balance

    This is not an exaggeration—it is already happening.Assam’s people must unite with the government to stop:

    Document fraud

    Legacy manipulation

    Border corruption

    Vote-bank appeasement

    Community-based infiltration networks

    If such activities continue, Assam may disappear from the cultural and political map as we know it. Protect Assam, Protect India Assam is fighting for its survival.
    The government has taken strong steps, but every citizen must take responsibility. Illegal immigration is not merely a “border issue”—it is a direct threat to India’s security, cultural heritage, and demographic stability.The people of Assam must stop enabling infiltrators and reject every anti-national activity that harms the state. The time to act is now. Assam’s identity will survive only if its people defend it.

  • Syeda Hameed Faces Heat for ‘Bangladeshis Welcome’ Remark

    Syeda Hameed Faces Heat for ‘Bangladeshis Welcome’ Remark

    Paromita Das

    New Delhi, 28th August:  When Bharat honors someone with the Padma Shri, it isn’t just a recognition of individual achievement—it is also a public endorsement of character, balance, and sensitivity to national concerns. That is why Syeda Saiyidain Hameed’s recent remark in Assam—“What’s wrong if they are Bangladeshis? Bangladeshis are also humans. Bangladeshis can also live here”—has sparked outrage across the nation.
    And this is not the first time. Hameed has a long history of making anti-Bharat statements, painting the nation as intolerant, divisive, and oppressive, whether it was about nationalism, minorities, or our neighbors. Earlier too, she has consistently spoken in tones that align more with Bharat’s detractors than with its own people. By repeating the same pattern today, she has shown that her disdain for the idea of Bharat is not new—it is habitual.
    For many, her words are not the voice of humanitarian compassion but a dangerous trivialization of a decades-old struggle that has cost Assamese lives, culture, and identity.

    A Padma Shri From Congress Rule – Political Intentions Behind Recognition?

    Hameed was awarded the Padma Shri in 2007, during the Congress-led UPA regime. At the time, the Congress government was accused of minority appeasement at the cost of national security and demographic stability. Today, it is hard not to see her award as part of a larger agenda—pushing Islamisation under the mask of pluralism, while deliberately ignoring the real fears of Hindus in border states like Assam.

    For a Padma Shri awardee to undermine Bharat’s sovereignty with such arrogance is nothing less than a national insult. She has dragged one of the nation’s highest civilian honors into disgrace by using it as a shield to promote anti-Bharat narratives.

    Silent on Hindu Genocide in Bangladesh

    What makes Hameed’s hypocrisy even more shameful is her silence on the horrific persecution of Hindus in Bangladesh. For decades, Hindus have been slaughtered, their temples destroyed, their homes burnt, their women paraded nude, raped, and set ablaze. These are not stories from the distant past but ongoing atrocities—yet Hameed has never once spoken against them.

    Why? Why does her so-called “humanity” vanish when it comes to Hindus? Why is her compassion reserved only for Muslim Bangladeshis, while Hindus who are tortured, murdered, and forced to flee get nothing but silence? This is not humanism—it is bigotry dressed up as virtue.

    The Remark That Struck Assam’s Nerve

    Illegal immigration is not a drawing-room debate in Assam; it is a brutal reality. Since 1971, waves of Bangladeshi migrants have flooded the state, drastically altering its demography. Indigenous Assamese now live with the existential fear of being reduced to a minority in their own homeland. The Assam Agitation (1979–85) cost more than 800 lives and led to the Assam Accord, which set March 24, 1971 as the cut-off for citizenship.

    Against this backdrop, Hameed’s dismissive remark—that “Bangladeshis are also humans” and hence can live here—is not just reckless, it is treacherous. Nobody questions their humanity. The question is: do they have the right to invade our land, eat away our resources, and destroy Assamese identity?

    Worse, she deliberately twisted facts by claiming evictions were happening “because Bangladeshis are Muslims.” This is a brazen lie. Even indigenous natives also  have been evicted in Assam those are having illegal possession of land . Her attempt to communalize a decades-long issue shows her real agenda: to inflame divisions and whitewash the crimes of illegal migrants.

    Selective Outrage: Silence on Hindu Suffering

    If Hameed truly stood for universal compassion, she would be the loudest voice against the plight of persecuted Hindus and the genocide of Hindus  in Bangladesh. But no—when Hindus are slaughtered and their women brutalized, she stays quiet. Yet when illegal Bangladeshi Muslims face eviction for violating our sovereignty, she calls it “inhuman.”

    This double standard exposes her moral bankruptcy. Her compass does not point to justice or humanity—it points only to her ideological convenience.

    A Clash of Ideologies: Humanism vs. National Survival

    Hameed’s worldview is not compassion—it is anarchic borderless utopianism. Assam’s history, its struggles, its sacrifices—she sweeps it all under the carpet to deliver her hollow sermons. But for Assamese people, this is not theory—it is about their land, their culture, and their very survival.

    The real question is: Should Bharat destroy its sovereignty and identity to accommodate an endless flood of illegal migrants, just because Hameed and her ilk want to posture as “humanists”? Or should we protect our citizens, our history, and our nation first? The answer is obvious.

    Words That Betray Responsibility

    As a former Planning Commission member and Padma Shri awardee, Hameed is not an ordinary citizen. Her words carry influence. But instead of using that influence responsibly, she has weaponized it to insult Assamese people and undermine Bharat’s fight against illegal migration.

    Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma said it plainly: “We are the sons and daughters of Lachit Barphukan. We will fight till the last drop of our blood to save our state and our identity.” His words resonate with every Assamese heart. Hameed’s words, on the other hand, resonate only with those who want Bharat weakened.

    Illegal Migrants and the Taxpayer’s Burden

    Beyond identity and culture, there is cold, hard economics. Every illegal migrant puts unbearable pressure on Bharat’s welfare system—ration, healthcare, education, subsidies. While citizens bleed taxes, illegal Bangladeshi Muslims siphon off benefits meant for Bharatiya.

    Calling this “compassion” is an insult. It is exploitation, plain and simple. And Hameed’s refusal to acknowledge this reality shows that she has no connection to the ground truth of Bharat.

    Compassion Without Accountability Is Betrayal

    Syeda Hameed’s words are not slips of the tongue; they are the repetition of a pattern—always anti-Bharat, always against the majority, always selective in outrage. And when this comes from a Padma Shri awardee, it is not just disgraceful—it is unforgivable.

    Compassion without accountability is not virtue—it is betrayal. Asking Assam to bear the burden of more illegal migrants in the name of humanity is not kindness—it is cruelty to the people of Assam who have already suffered for decades.

    Yes, Bangladeshis are humans. But humanity does not grant anyone the right to violate Bharat’s borders, loot Bharat’s resources, and destabilise Bharat’s culture.

    The Responsibility of Influence

    The Padma Shri is not simply a medal—it is the nation’s faith. Syeda Hameed has betrayed that faith. Instead of standing for balance, responsibility, and truth, she has misused her stature to insult Bharat and side with infiltrators.

    Her words have poured salt on Assam’s wounds and exposed her as a mouthpiece of propaganda. Her selective silence on Hindu suffering, her communal lies, and her reckless support for illegal immigration make her “humanism” nothing but hollow rhetoric.  Her award It must be scrapped she does not deserve it.

    If this is compassion, it is compassion against Bharat. And that is not compassion—it is complicity.