Tag: legal action

  • Global Indian Dr. Poonam Gupta OBE & Eminent Community Leader Slams “Toxic, Misogynistic Behaviour” Within OFBJP UK, Warns of Legal Action

    Global Indian Dr. Poonam Gupta OBE & Eminent Community Leader Slams “Toxic, Misogynistic Behaviour” Within OFBJP UK, Warns of Legal Action

    GG News Bureau
    Glasgow, UK, 26th Oct: Global Indian Dr. Poonam Gupta OBE & Eminent Community Leader ,living in Scotland ,has issued a powerful statement condemning what she described as “toxic, misogynistic behaviour and false propaganda” within a section of the Overseas Friends of BJP (OFBJP) UK. Expressing full support for fellow member Susheel Ji .President Kuldeep Singh Shekhawat & all Supporters for India and PM Modi .
    Mrs Gupta said it was “long overdue that someone had the courage to call out this disgraceful conduct.”

    “For too long, many of us have chosen silence out of decency, believing that karma will eventually deliver justice. But silence should not be mistaken for weakness. It is time to speak the truth,” she said.

    Recalling her long association with the organisation, Dr. Poonam Gupta stated that her experiences with this group date back to 2021, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Scotland. She and her team, along with her husband with OFBJP team in the leadership of Kuldeep Ji Shekhawat worked tirelessly to ensure the Prime Minister received a warm welcome. Despite their efforts, she claimed that not a single member from OFBJP UK, London, came forward to assist during the event.

    Following the successful event, she alleged that Dhruv Kumar and Suresh Ji visited her home and were treated with respect. However, tensions arose when Dhruv Kumar expressed interest in joining the OFBJP Scotland core committee, but his inclusion was declined by the team. “If he truly wanted to serve the community, he could have chosen to support from outside the core team, like many others. But that was not what he wanted,” she said.

    Dr. Gupta revealed that soon after, an attempt was made to fraudulently alter her company’s ownership through forged signatures — an act she immediately reported to the police and the Inland Revenue Services in Scotland. She added that the act appeared to be an effort to malign her husband’s image by changing the company ownership to his name, though he had no knowledge of it.

    Highlighting the misogyny she faced, Dr. Gupta said she was constantly questioned about “what she had done to deserve to be the Convenor in Scotland,” as if her gender, and not her work, defined her worth. She further alleged that during a protest against the BBC in Glasgow in January 2023, Dhruv Kumar verbally assaulted her publicly, an incident that was reported to the leadership.

    In 2024, Dr. Gupta said she became the target of a smear campaign when defamatory and fabricated articles accusing her and her family of serious crimes were circulated online. The blog site removed these within 24 hours, but the same group circulated screenshots to over 160 recipients, including Members of the Scottish Parliament and the Ministry of External Affairs, just minutes before her scheduled speech at the Scottish Parliament. “This was a clear and coordinated attempt to humiliate and discredit me,” she stated.

    Dr. Gupta further accused Darshan Grewal of spreading fresh slander against her and her husband, sharing defamatory messages via WhatsApp. “Having personally endured their tactics, I know exactly how this group operates and how low they are willing to stoop,” she said.

    She declared that she has every right to pursue legal action against the individuals involved for harassment, defamation, and intimidation. “What has stopped me so far is my deep respect for our community and my reluctance to see Indians publicly divided in a foreign land. But make no mistake — I will not hesitate to act if this persecution continues,” Dr. Gupta warned.

    Accusing Dhruv Kumar of running a “sustained campaign of harassment” against her, her company, and those close to her, she described the pattern as “misogyny, insecurity, and systematic abuse to achieve power.”

    “I have been a victim of this targeted hate for years — today it is me and Kuldeep ji Shekhawat, a thorough gentleman staunch supporter of BJP & PM Modi jI have had the privilege to know over the years; tomorrow it could be anyone who dares to do good work,” she remarked.

    Concluding her statement, Dr. Gupta expressed her solidarity with members of OFBJP UK who continue to uphold integrity and unity, naming Kuldeep Ji, Shishir Ji, and Vijay Ji as examples of those working tirelessly for the betterment of the community. She criticised a few individuals for being driven by jealousy and greed, seeking only “photo opportunities with ministers and VIPs visiting from India.”

    “You cannot always see jealousy, but you can feel when someone’s energy changes around your success,” she said, adding, “This Diwali, I hope these individuals reflect on their actions and understand that no lie can outshine truth — and no hate campaign can overcome integrity.”

  • Batla House Residents Must Challenge Demolitions Individually: Delhi HC

    Batla House Residents Must Challenge Demolitions Individually: Delhi HC

    GG News Bureau
    New Delhi, 11th June: The Delhi High Court today allowed Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MLA Amanatullah Khan to withdraw his public interest lawsuit (PIL) against the demolition drive in Batla House. However, the court provided a critical three-day window for affected residents to directly approach the court for relief.

    A bench of Justices Girish Kathpalia and Tejas Karia emphasized that the court cannot issue a general order through a PIL, as it could “jeopardise the case of individual litigants.” The judges noted, “We need to see why authorities keep sleeping as individuals raise structures and one day wake up and decide to demolish… we need to ensure justice.”

    This decision followed the Delhi Development Authority (DDA)’s refusal to give any official assurance to temporarily halt demolitions. The court stated that such broad requests via PILs would be “counterproductive.”

    When Mr. Khan’s lawyer referred to a past case (Ishrat Jahan) where a single-judge bench had granted relief, the court reiterated that affected individuals must approach it personally, just as in that instance.

    Allegations of Improper Notices
    Khan’s lawyer also argued that the demolitions were going beyond the specific area covered by a Supreme Court order (Khasra No. 279), with notices being randomly posted on houses outside this boundary. The court clarified that any resident beyond Khasra No. 279 could seek legal help under the remedy provided by the Supreme Court.

    In his withdrawn petition, Khan had claimed that the DDA issued vague and generic notices without identifying individual structures or residents. He alleged this violated citizens’ constitutional rights. He further argued that while the demolitions were based on a Supreme Court order, that order explicitly required “due process of law,” including a 15-day notice period and other legal safeguards, which the DDA allegedly ignored.

    The petitioner also stated that many Batla House residents were unaware of their legal rights and that the DDA’s “showcause notices” did not meet Supreme Court guidelines.

    The DDA, on its part, countered that Khan’s petition was not valid as a PIL. It insisted that its notices were specific and fully complied with Supreme Court guidelines, adding that no demolition was happening without proper notice.